New Resilience Report – from OECD

Building a Roadmap to Resilience: Tools for field people:

Everybody is talking about resilience. The idea that people, institutions and states need the right tools, assets and skills to deal with an increasingly complex, interconnected and evolving risk landscape, while retaining the ability to seize opportunities to increase overall well-being, is widely accepted.

This document provides a step by step approach to resilience systems analysis, a tool that helps field practitioners to:

•    prepare for, and facilitate, a successful multi- stakeholder resilience analysis workshop
•    design a roadmap to boost the resilience of communities and societies
•    integrate the results of the analysis into their development and humanitarian programming

Two Notable Reports from the World Bank Conference on Recovery

The World Bank Conference, details of which I noted last week, was interesting and provided a wide array of views and experiences. Two of the the reports I acquired that I think are notable are:

(1) Area Business Continuity Management; Scalable Cross Sector Coordination Framework of Disaster management for Business Continuity. Japan International Cooperation Agency. [16 pp; no date.]
and
(2) Guide to Developing Disaster Recovery Frameworks: World Reconstruction Conference Version, Sept. 2014. (100 pages) Source: GFDRR.

HUD to Launch Competition for Disaster Resilience Money

I have heard this twice before; hopefully, the third time is the charm! From the Asbury Park (NJ) Press: HUD launches competition for disaster resilience money.

States and localities recovering from natural disasters, including Superstorm Sandy, can begin competing for a portion of nearly $1 billion in grants to recover from those disasters and protect themselves against future ones, the nation’s top housing official said Wednesday.

Here is the direct link to the HUD website for more details.

Update on Sept. 19th: today the Rockefeller Foundation announced they will be collaborating with HUD on this new initiative.

Further Discussion of “Disaster Recovery Is a National Disgrace”

Guest Posting from an experienced EM practitioner, and former co-director of the EM Forum, Ms Avagene Moore. [This is a follow on to the posting done last week with title noted above.]

Einstein also said that insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. This can be applied to all aspects of the disaster business as well as all institutions of society.

There are many well-seasoned and experienced disaster professionals in the field world-wide. Unfortunately, we lack a way of channeling, compiling and making the most of that expertise and real-world knowledge. We continue to talk about the gap between research and practitioners but make little if any headway in bringing them together to benefit the disaster business. We nibble around the edges of situations, skirt the issues and rarely get to the core of the problems. Personally, I have to believe there is a way and I know there is a pressing need to change the perspective and culture of this multi-billion dollar disaster industry.

After 40 years in the emergency management field, my questions are: 1) Are we as the disaster community, at all levels, honest enough – dare I say thick-skinned enough – to examine ourselves and see the good, bad and the ugly? Having done that — 2) How do we courageously speak as one collective knowledgeable voice that is loud enough to be heard and make a difference?

World Reconstruction Conference at the World Bank- update

The Diva is attending this conference: From Adversity to Opportunity: How the Aftermath of a Disaster Can Lead to a Safer Future. Note: Live video and Twitter feeds are available; see conference site for details.

This week, hundreds of experts, policymakers and practitioners will gather in Washington, D.C., for the second World Reconstruction Conference to explore how to use post-disaster recovery and reconstruction processes to create better lives and livelihoods around the world.

Launching at the conference will be the Recovery Framework Guide, which provides guidance for governments to better design and implement comprehensive disaster recovery programs.

Update: The newly issued documents are available for download:

Questions re H. Sandy Task Force Report and Outcomes

What ever happened to the many recommendations make in the H. Sandy Task Force Report?  It has been slightly more than one year since the issuance of the Task Force’s report. At that time the Diva was optimistic about the high-level federal interest in recovery (since the initiative for the Task Force was an Executive Order) and the requirement of some follow through on the recommendations to improve recovery in the future.

The report contained 69 recommendations; however, finding out which ones have been acted upon and what the implementation has been is impossible to determine. HUD’s website for H. Sandy Task Force Report and actions is dated – their last report was in the spring.

By way of background, see the article I wrote for Emergency Management Magazine (Nov./Dec. 2013 issue)titled: Hurricane Sandy Task Force Issues Recommendations for Long-Term Recovery. Too see the many other articles on the Sandy recovery process in this blog over the past two years  just use the search function on in the lower right column on the homepage of the blog.

Update on Sept. 9: HUD staff told me that a fall report on progress is in the works.

Disaster Recovery Is a National Disgrace

This past week the NY Times featured a lengthy, detailed article about the travails of New York residents struggling to recovery from Hurricane Sandy. See: Hurricane Sandy Recovery Program in New York City Was Mired by Its Design; Broken Pledges and Bottlenecks Hurt Mayor Bloomberg’s Build It Back Effort.

Shortly after it appeared I got a note from James Fossett making the following points:  “Your readers may be interested in this account of the difficulties New York City’s been having getting its home repair program moving after Hurricane Sandy. All the execution problems that have been noted before in trying to stand up an improvised program from scratch—bad design by expensive consultants, large numbers of untrained temporary hires who don’t quite get how programs are supposed to work, software that doesn’t work, plus too much focus on avoiding fraud. We still don’t know how to do large scale recovery effectively.”  [He is the author of an important piece titled Let’s Stop Improvising Recovery, which I posted here some months ago.]

I urge you to read the whole NYTimes article, but here are a couple of key points:

While hundreds of millions of dollars in federal money sat waiting to be used, devastated homeowners were stuck in a n application process that was overdesigned and undermanaged……”

Nearly every federally financed disaster recovery problem has stumbled because of complicated rules and the difficulty of creating a large-scale operation in the aftermath of a crisis. But there is a widespread perception … that …  the city’s program miscalculations worsened matters.

Granted that recovery may be perceived as a “wicked” problem, a term the public  public administration community uses for  complex and/or intractable problems. But there is some serious literature on such problems — just plug the term into Google Scholar and look.

More than once I have also lamented the fact that federal officials have never made the effort to engage the public administration and related research communities — via either the National Academy of Sciences of the National Academy of Public Administration — to help them think through the process of long term recovery from disasters. We have wasted time and billions of dollars over the past several decades. Not to mention the human anguish from inept recovery efforts.

All levels of government and all sectors of society have work to do to improve recovery.  It’s time to admit the inadequacies and get help dealing with them.

Resilience Measures — conference with online access

The Diva attended this event. While there she meet a couple of blog followers.

UPDATE: As of Sept. 30th a video of the sessions has been posted to the NAS website: http://resilientamerica.nas.edu

****************************************************

Workshop: Measures of Community Resilience: From Lessons Learned to Lessons Applied

Friday, September 5, 2014
9:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
National Academy of Sciences Building – Auditorium
2101 Constitution Ave., N.W. – Washington, DC 20418

  • View the Agenda
  • Access online The Resilient America Roundtable will host a workshop that focuses on the kinds of indicators that exist for measuring resilience, and which indicators communities might use and why.

The workshop will use as a foundation for discussion the four broad types of resilience indicators identified in the NRC (2012) report Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative: