“Preserving Heritage Boosts Disaster Resilience”

From Reliefweb, this account of a session at the UN conference in Mexico: Preserving heritage boosts disaster resilience.

Cultural heritage and indigenous knowledge are key resources of community and national disaster resilience across the world.

However, much of this heritage and knowledge is being lost to both sudden and slow-onset disasters, weakening the resilience capacity of future generations.

To reverse the trend, a session at the 2017 Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction has made a series of recommendations to strengthen investment in such ‘human infrastructure’.

Culture-Based Disaster Risk Reduction

Presently, in Mexico the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction is going on. Here is more on the conference:

The Global Platform in Cancun Mexico is in its final day. Don’t miss the live webcasts http://unisdr.org/gp2017, and see over 120 videos of all sessions – already available on the Global Platform website http://unisdr.org/go/gp2017/programme, and on the UNISDR YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/user/UNISDR/playlists

An interesting new concept and brief paper on Culture-Based Disaster Risk Reduction will be handed out at that conference. Thanks to Dr. Laura Olson, one of the authors, for the information.

“How Social Ties Make Us Resilient to Trauma”

How social ties make us resilient to trauma.  Excerpt:

Hardening our society is one way to make us more resilient to hazards – that is, to allow us to bounce back from adversity more quickly. But we cannot armor our societies against all threats. Millions of people in cities like Boston, Mumbai, Ghana, Tel Aviv and Tokyo use public transportation systems, attend concerts, go to parks, visit malls and walk in public daily. All of these locations are vulnerable to those who would do us harm, and we cannot police them all. Further, protecting against one type of physical threat, such as an active shooter, does little to shield society against other types of dangers, such as vehicular attacks. My research on the role of social networks during and after crises provides an alternative approach. Rather than focusing on hardening our physical infrastructure, our societies become more resilient when we deepen and broaden our social infrastructure. Social ties provide emotional support, information and collective action at critical times.

Thanks to Dan Aldrich, the author, for calling this article to my attention.

New Disaster Knowledge Hub in Australia

Disaster Resilience Knowledge Hub launched in Australia.

The Australian Institute for Disaster Resilience has launched a new knowledge hub that will act as a source of expertise for government organisations and communities working to prepare for natural disasters.

The hub currently provides access to resources including the Emergency Management Library and Australian Journal of Emergency Management collections, as well as multiple disaster resilience and emergency management handbooks and manuals.

 

“The Science of Preparing Cities for Natural Disasters”

This article provides a review of the new book The Cure for Catastrophe: How We Can Stop Manufacturing Natural Disasters, by its author, Robert Muir-Wood. He is the CEO of Risk Management Solutions.  Worth reading and considering his negative views of emergency management as presently conducted.  Some excerpts follow:

If you want to understand what really drives the risk and what you need to do, it comes down to planning decisions. It comes down to building codes and their enforcement, and avoiding corruption in how the building-code process functions, because the building sector is typically the most corrupt sector of any country. The level of corruption, we know, correlates quite strongly with casualties in disasters.

To make all this happen we need to really educate people about their risks — improving risk literacy so that people understand the need for warnings and the need for evacuation procedures. There are lots of things that a city leader can do to get their city to be resilient. It involves really engaging with people and educating them about the risks .

Book Review: How to Write an Emergency Plan

How to Write an Emergency Plan, by David Alexander (2016). Publisher: Dunedin Academic Press, UK. Paperback: 268 pages. ISBN/ISSN: 9781780460130. $36. U.S.

Reviewer: Jean Slick, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Disaster and Emergency Management Program, Royal Roads University, Victoria, B.C., Canada

Alexander’s (2016) newest book, How to Write an Emergency Plan, provides readers with practical advice about emergency planning. In this regard, the content of the book is as much about planning processes as it is about the content and structure of an emergency plan. This new book expands on Alexander’s previous work on the subject of emergency planning, including his article Toward the Development of a Standard in Emergency Planning (Alexander, 2005) and his earlier book Principles of Emergency Planning and Management (Alexander, 2002). Further, in this latest book, Alexander draws from his exploration of the role and use of scenarios as a particular tool for advancing emergency management practice (Alexander, 2000).

While Alexander is a Professor of Risk and Disaster Reduction at University of College London and a distinguished academic, his newest book is written for a lay audience and is intended to function as a guide for anyone, anywhere, who has a responsibility for emergency planning. The book is generally jargon free and key terms are defined and topics are properly introduced, making the book valuable for those without formal education or training relating to emergency management. While the book draws from both research and practice knowledge about emergency planning, the book is written in a conversational style with limited references to academic literature. The lack of references would most likely limit the utility of the book in graduate level disaster and emergency management programs, however the book would be a good supplement in lower level post-secondary or training programs.

The ‘how to’ nature of the book is reflected in the structure of the book, which includes the following sections:

  • Introduction
  • What are emergencies?
  • What is an emergency plan?
  • The emergency planning process
  • First step: background research
  • Second step: scenario building
  • Third step: from scenarios to actions
  • A note about the structure of the plan
  • Fourth step: using the plan
  • Planning to maintain the continuity of normal activities
  • Specialized emergency planning
  • Conclusion: the future of emergency planning

Throughout the book, Alexander presents principles of practice that apply to emergency planning regardless of the context. The principles provide a concise summary of generic rules that should inform emergency planning. An example of a principle offered in the Introduction chapter is, “emergency planning is about helping to create a common language and culture, and common objectives, for the organizations and people who respond to emergencies” (Alexander, 2016, p. 7). Most but not all sections in the book offer one or more principles that help to summarize and reinforce key best practices. While this approach has great merit, some further attention to the consistent use and placement of the principles would increase the value of this method for distilling key practices.

The first four chapters in the book provide a practical orientation to the topic of emergency planning. In the Introduction chapter, Alexander describes the need for and benefits of emergency planning, and situates this planning with reference to civil protection functions of governments. He reinforces that planning for local response is essential, while at the same time emphasizing that coordination with planning across levels of government is needed.

The next two chapters, What are Emergencies and What is an Emergency Plan, as the titles suggest, provide foundational knowledge such as the distinction between emergencies, disasters and catastrophes, and an explanation of the rationale for an all-hazards approach to emergency planning. Chapter 3 also addresses plan ownership, as well as the need for planning to be a participatory process; while these are important topics, they seem to fit better with the topic for Chapter 4.

Chapter 4, The Emergency Planning Process, begins by talking about the role of context in planning, as well as the function of pertinent legislation and laws. Alexander then proposes a five-step emergency planning process, which includes (a) research, (b) writing, (c) publicity, (d) operations, and (e) updating. While these steps make sense, they are not the same set of steps used to frame the next set of chapters. Consistency in the framing of the recommended steps in an emergency planning process would help to reinforce the planning model offered in this book. As a practitioner turned academic, I would have liked to have seen further attention given to expanding practitioners’ knowledge of the types of organizations (i.e., DRC model) engaged in emergency response, as well as discussion about the need to plan for as well as engage with these different types of organizations in the planning process. Further, the rationale of the need to plan for emergent response, based on what is known about collective behaviours following a disaster, is important for practitioners to understand. While noting these limitations, the merit of the chapter is its emphasis on planning as a process, rather than a product.

The next set of chapters (5-9) each spell out in considerable detail the scope of work required in each step of the planning process. Chapter 5, on Background Research, explains the core components of hazard, risk and vulnerability assessments. While noting that an audit of emergency management resources (e.g., human, technical) is also required as part of the research step, further attention to the need to assess community capacities, in addition to vulnerabilities, would have strengthened this chapter.

Chapter 6, on Scenario Building, draws from Alexander’s (2000) previous exploration of this topic. Given that all contingencies cannot be planned for, the value in scenario development as part of the emergency planning process, is reflected in one of Alexander’s principles on this topic, which states, “the scenario methodology should produce a range of outcomes, representing the envelope of possibilities for the impact of a hazard under the range of different conditions that is expected to occur in the affected area” (p. 67). Alexander provides a detailed description of the process of scenario modeling, and those who have not previously used this approach would likely find this chapter to be of great value.

Chapter 7, From Scenarios to Actions, as the title suggests, explains how to use the results from the hazard, risk and vulnerability analysis, as well as scenario modelling, to specify the kinds of emergency management actions required in the plan. While the distinction between agent and hazard generated needs and demands is not explained in this chapter, examples of both of these types of needs as guiding actions are listed. The topic of command systems is explored and the need for coordination is addressed in this chapter, as is the need for and function of an emergency operations center.

Chapter 8, entitled, A Note on the Structure of the Plan, offers a generic structure for building and writing an emergency response plan. While the suggested content of the first five chapters of a plan are well described, the content of the chapter ‘emergency management specifications,’ seems to address some topics (e.g., evacuation, search and rescue), but miss others (e.g., food, shelter). A summary of the major elements of a plan is provided at the end of the chapter, but the frame for this is not the same as the structure for the plan offered. Chapter 9, Using the Plan, reinforces the dynamic nature of emergency planning, and talks about the need to test plans, as well as to incorporate learning from actual responses.

In Chapter 10, the focus in the book shifts to the topic of Planning to Maintain the Continuity of Normal Activities. This chapter addresses the importance and distinction of business continuity planning, as type of emergency planning activity. Chapter 11, on Specialized Emergency Planning, goes on to explore specific needs and considerations related to planning for (a) different sectors (e.g., health system, industrial facilities, tourism); (b) different hazard types (e.g., pandemic, terrorism); and (c) particular hazard-generated needs (e.g., mass-fatalities). A limitation of this chapter is that no such frame for explaining these different types of specialized planning needs is offered. The book concludes with Alexander posing and responding to questions related to emergency planning, as well as with a discussion of international frameworks that inform practice (e.g., Sendai).

Overall, the book provides considerable guidance related to developing and writing an emergency plan. While noting that context matters and explaining how it matters (e.g., local hazards, legislation), Alexander’s approach to how to develop and write an emergency plan is for the most part, context-independent. Further, while the book recognizes mandated responsibility for emergency planning by civil authorities, the idea of emergency management as being a distributed function within society, with other entities (e.g., industry, schools) also having responsibility for emergency planning is acknowledged. In this regard, there is good value in Alexander’s newest book for a broad audience who have interest in or responsibility for emergency planning.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Calgary Canada in the Spotlight

The province of Calgary has been the focal point of recent major disasters in Canada. Here is an account of actions underway: ‘Resilient Calgary’ to highlight natural disaster research, resilience in Alberta. Some excerpts:

Three out of the four costliest natural disasters in Canada happened within the last six years, right here in Alberta, according to the Insurance Bureau of Canada.

Those natural disasters were the Slave Lake fire in 2011, the Southern Alberta flood in 2013 and the Fort McMurrary wildfire last year. The other disaster was the Red River flood that took place in Manitoba in 1997.

After the 2013 flood, the Centre for Community Disaster Research was created after recognizing communities across Alberta and the world need to plan and prepare for extreme events. The centre focuses on research, education and outreach related to natural, social, technological and economic disasters.

It will host Resilient Calgary at Mount Royal University, a TEDTalk-style series of presentations highlighting disaster research in Alberta.