Once Again – Failure to Adequately Assess Risks Has Dire Consequences

Human Error Triggers Rise in Catastrophe Cost. Article in CFO.com, June 19. The economic losses from natural disasters and other extreme events have dramatically increased in each of the past three decades. But industry and governments still fail to protect against catastrophic risks.

Economic and insured losses against natural disasters, technological accidents, and terrorism have risen every decade since the 1980s, says Munich Re. The international insurer estimates that economic losses from natural catastrophes hit $1.6 trillion in the 2001 to 2011 period. The Japan earthquake of 2011 alone caused an economic loss of $210 billion (along with insured losses of $35 billion to $40 billion).

Why? The escalating costs of disaster are more about flaws in human behavior and risk management than bad luck, say two business-school professors in a recently released paper, “Managing Catastrophic Risk.” Howard C. Kunreuther of the Wharton School for Risk Management and Geoffrey M. Heal, a finance and economics professor at Columbia Business School, say the overarching reason for the high costs of catastrophe is that companies and individuals are “locating in harm’s way while not taking appropriate protective measures.” In particular, they are failing to guard against low-probability, high-consequence events.

A copy of the full paper ( 20 pp.) can be found here.

Global Risk Report for 2012 and Global Think Tank List

The Global Risks Report 2012

Image by World Economic Forum via Flickr

Once again I am straying from the main theme of this blog, but I do want to share an unusual report that provides some very compelling information and context for those of us interested in emergency management and homeland security.

From the World Economic Forum, the report on Global Risks 2012.  I think this is an amazing piece of work from some significant players in the risk world; the 64 page report was issued Jan. 2012.  I think you will share my perception that risk and emergency managers will be busy for the foreseeable!

Note that this research product was done by corporate and university sponsors.

_____________________________________

Another major report came out this week, this one as assessment of Think Tank List  The full text is included here.

New UN Report on Risk

UN Peacekeepers Distribute Water and Food in Haiti

Image by United Nations Photo via Flickr

UN finds natural disasters now less deadly but more costly. Radio Australia, August 5, 2011. The United Nations has released its latest report on the state of disaster risk management around the world. The report, titled Revealing Risk, Redefining Development, updates the UN’s Global Assessment Report, since 2009, when the first edition was published. It found that while people in the region now have a reduced chance of dying in a natural disaster, the countries which suffer them, will find themselves facing a bigger cost.

This 24 page report is well-written; I recommend it to you.

Japan Disasters — risk management explained

“Why Plan B Often Works Out Badly.” Interesting explanation of Risk Management, from MSNBC commentator, March 18, 2011. Two quotes follow:

Engineers used to talk about guarding against the “single point of failure” when designing critical systems like aircraft control systems or nuclear power plants. But rarely does one mistake or event cause a catastrophe. As we’ve seen in Japan, disaster is usually a function of multiple mistakes and a string of bad luck, often called an “event cascade” or “propagating failures.”

Defending against and preparing for such event cascades is a problem that vexes all kinds of systems designers, from airplane engineers to anti-terrorism planners.  There’s a simple reason, according to Peter Neumann, principal scientist at the Computer Science Lab at SRI International, a not-for-profit research institute. Emergency drills and stress tests aside, Neumann said, there is no good way to simulate a real emergency and its unpredictable consequences. Making matters worse is the ever-increasing interconnectedness of systems, which leads to cascading failures, and the fact that preventative maintenance is a dying art.

Thanks to Anne Strauss for calling it to my attention.

____________________________

Of general interst, the posting today (March 20) by blogger Phil Palin on the Japan Disasters.