Updates on Japan’s recovery process

A BBC news article on Sept. 21, 2011 cites a World Bank report about the duration of recovery in Japan:

According to the World Bank, Japan may need up to five years to rebuild from the disastrous earthquake and tsunami that has caused up to $235bn (£145bn) of damage, the World Bank said in a report.

It also estimates that 0.5 percentage points will be shaved from the country’s economic growth this year. However, it expects growth to pick up again in the second half of the year. The 11 March earthquake and tsunami, disrupted production networks in the automotive and electronic industries.

“Damage to housing and infrastructure has been unprecedented,” the World Bank said. “Growth should pick up through subsequent quarters as reconstruction efforts, which could last five years, accelerate,” it said. The bank estimates the damage to be between $123bn and $235bn. This is the equivalent of between 2.5% and 4% of the country’s economic output in 2010.

The World Bank stressed that it was too early to accurately assess the cost of the damage, but said it was likely to be greater than the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Potential costs of the disaster
March quake and tsunami  Kobe earthquake 1995

I agree with the comment from Bill Cumming (noted below) that the time estimate seems understated, and that the response is likely to take decades.  I have no ability to estimate costs, but it the duration of the recovery is understated chances are the costs are too.

One more thing:  For those of you who are closely tracking the recovery process in Japan, I have uploaded the full text (43 pp) in English of the JAPAN_basic_guidelines_reconstruction_here. The source is Reconstruction Headquarters in Response to the Great East Japan Earthquake, a special operational unit of the Cabinet Secretariat.

Many thanks to fellow blogger Phil Palin for providing this information.

Economic Resilience Report – from an Australian Bank

CBA Building Martin Place

Image via Wikipedia

From the Continuity Central website, notice of a new report titled Economic and community resilience: the impacts of natural disasters; Sept. 20.  This is a useful, informative 24 page document, and I recommend you read the full report. From the summary of findings provided by Continuity Central:

A new publication from The Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) explores the lessons that governments, financial institutions and retailers around the globe can learn from Australia’s experience of the longer-term impact of natural disasters on personal income and the wider economy. [Emphasis added ]

Analysis in the report provides new insight into the short and longer term effects that natural disasters can have on sources of income, salary levels and salary recipients. For example, it shows that it takes from 6 to 18 months for the majority of personal income sources to return to pre-disaster conditions, with very high proportions of people receiving some form of government support to rebuild their lives in the interim.

Other key findings are:

• There are four main factors that shape the pathway to personal income recovery in the disaster affected communities: scale, frequency of disasters, local industry profile and proximity to population hubs;

• Frequent, repeated disasters can hinder personal income recovery. For example, the cumulative effect of flood and cyclone damage is still hurting North Queensland, with key agricultural industries (sugar cane and tropical fruits) having insufficient recovery time between events. As a result, increasing proportions of people are relying on unemployment benefits as their only source of income, with average salary amounts continuing to decline

• Even when people are not directly impacted by natural disasters, they can feel they are – two thirds of Australians believe the recent natural disasters had a negative impact on the national economy;

• Some disasters such as the 2011 Queensland floods are of such magnitude that they impact on the broader economy. However at a macro-economic level, the economic cost of disasters is usually recouped in the subsequent rebuild. For instance, tradespersons engaged in rebuilding activity can look forward to strong employment opportunities;

• Local industries are affected differently by natural disasters. Where agriculture is dominant, what is grown or farmed matters. For example, crops that rely on established trees, like bananas grown in North Queensland, may take multiple seasons to recover, impacting heavily on local employment prospects;

• Proximity to large towns/cities makes a difference to personal economic recovery. For the Victorian bushfire communities, the close proximity to metro-based sources of employment and services helped residents to maintain employment and local residency. Whilst high proportions of bushfire-affected residents migrated in the aftermath of the disaster, the majority moved less than 50 km away;

• Localised disasters have a truly national impact – almost four out of ten Australians say they were impacted by recent natural disasters (affected either directly, or indirectly through family and friends).

Housing Recovery Decisions in Japan

Sendai view

Image by arditpg via Flickr

From the Japanese press: Sendai to bar new housing in areas threatened by flooding in future tsunami.  Sept. 18.

Housing construction will be forbidden in areas of Sendai thought to be at risk of over 2-meter-high flooding during a tsunami, according to the city’s draft recovery plan.

After the massive tsunami triggered by the March 11 Great East Japan Earthquake caused catastrophic damage to the coastal areas of Sendai, the city is drawing up a reconstruction plan aimed at mitigating damage from future natural disasters.

According to the draft revealed on Sept. 15, construction of additional houses in coastal areas of Sendai thought to be at risk of flooding of over 2 meters if another tsunami strikes will generally be prohibited. Furthermore, main coastal roads will be elevated using debris and sand left by the March 11 quake and tsunami, making them “secondary breakwaters.”

Thanks to Phil Palin, blogger at www.hlswatch.com, for pointing this article out to me.

Japan – showing resilience during a difficult recovery

Map of Japan with Fukushima highlighted

Image via Wikipedia

Japan’s Way Back; Six months after the nightmare of 3/11, a resilient nation is rebuilding—and taking stock of a new era.  Wall St. Journal, Sept. 10

A Japanese magazine recently declared that, after six decades, sengo Japan had been replaced by saigo Japan—that is, the postwar era had given way to the post-disaster era. Just as the country’s politics, economy and society had been transformed by the trauma and destruction of World War II, so now are its foundations being remade by the calamity of March 11, whose six-month anniversary falls this Sunday, just as Americans mark their own unhappy anniversary.

The comparison to World War II is an exaggeration. As colossal as the quake, tsunami and nuclear accident were, they don’t begin to match the scale of what the country faced in 1945. But a half year after the combined disasters—which have left, at last count, 15,780 confirmed dead and another 4,122 missing—Japan is still wrestling with the disruption and dislocation unleashed that day.

“Seven times down, eight times up,” is a popular Japanese expression for resilience after adversity. It is often symbolized by the round Daruma good-luck doll that bobs up after getting knocked down. On July 8—chosen for the date of 7/8—the Fukushima prefecture city of Koriyama held a Daruma festival to inspire the refugees from the surrounding area.

 

One more article re “civic paralysis” may be of interest.  Recovery is very hard, if not impossible, for some small towns that are devastated.  Sept. 12, 2011.

2011 – a year replete with expensive disasters

Tower Bridge, Lodon Tower, & Swiss Re building

Image by flow14 via Flickr

If you share my feeling that 2011 is a year full of disasters and calamaties, here are some statistics to back up that impression.  From the Swiss Re insurance co., Catastrophes cost the insurance industry USD 70 billion in the first half year of 2011; Sept. 9, 2011.

Based on first half 2011 events:

  •     2011 will be the year with the highest insured earthquake losses in history
  •     2011 ranks already as the second costliest year for insured catastrophic losses

According to preliminary sigma estimates, total insured losses for the global insurance industry from natural catastrophes and man-made disasters reached an estimated USD 70 billion in the first half of 2011. This is more than double the figure of USD 29 billion for the first six months of 2010. Claims from natural catastrophes alone reached USD 67 billion in the first half of 2011, compared to USD 27 billion in the same period of last year.

Total economic losses to the society (insured and uninsured) for the first half year’s disasters were almost USD 278 billion. Approximately 26 000 people lost their lives in catastrophes in the first six months of 2011, most of them in Japan.

With more than USD 70 billion in insured catastrophe losses in the first half year alone, 2011 already ranks as the second most expensive year according to sigma records. This figure was only surpassed in 2005 when total catastrophe claims amounted to USD 120 billion, with hurricanes Katrina, Wilma and Rita causing claims of over USD 90 billion.

Debris Removal – pictures of before and after Japan disasters

Amazing pictures of the massive debris that collected in Japan post disasters.  Too bad the article did not say more about how they did it and where they put it.  The sheer volume of the debris is mindboggling. Sept. 8,2011.

GAO’s Assessment of the Dept. of Homeland Security, 10 years after 911

This posting is a bit off topic, but I thought this massive new GAO report was worth highlighting.  I have not yet read it, but here are the long and short versions:

The title of the GAO report is Dept. of Homeland Security: Progress Made and Work Remaining in Implementing Homeland Security Missions 10 years after 911.  A 30 page version, in the form of testimony given to Congress is provided here.  The full report, which is 226 pages, is provided here.

Recovery Plans for Christchurch, NZ – a few perspectives and updates

One of the reasons I often report on the NZ earthquake efforts is that they provide a useful frame of reference for U.S. and other recovery planners.  It reminds us of what enormous efforts are needed to manage tens of thousands of housing units and other structures after a major earthquake.  See this article in the Sidney (Australia) Morning Herald, Sept. 5. NZ quake plan will save 10,000 homes.

Almost 10,000 earthquake-hit Christchurch homes have been saved from demolition in a draft recovery plan for the southern New Zealand city.

The long term strategy, which was released on Monday following a four-hour cabinet meeting in Christchurch, covers all aspects of the city’s $NZ25 billion ($A20.07 billion) rebuild.

Its release marks the anniversary of the first of a series of earthquakes that devastated parts of the city, beginning on September 4 last year.