Comparison of NZ and US seismic safety approaches

New Zealand quake could cost up to $4.5 billion, Market Watch, Sept. 7. Some interesting differences between NZ and US – there most residential structures have earthquake insurance. And their new construction requires consideration of seismic risk, but relatively few older masonry buildings were retrofitted for seismic safety. Sadly, the central business district of ChristChurch lost many of its historic masonry buildings.

Another take on the estimated damage and an explanation of how residential insurance coverage is done in N.Z.  Up To $4.5B In Losses Predicted From N.Z. Earthquake, Sept. 7.

This entry was posted in Earthquake, Seismic Safety and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Comparison of NZ and US seismic safety approaches

  1. scrubone says:

    there most residential structures have earthquake insurance.

    If you have house/building insurance then you have earthquake cover – cover from the government Earthquake Commission is included automatically.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s