Comparison of NZ and US seismic safety approaches

New Zealand quake could cost up to $4.5 billion, Market Watch, Sept. 7. Some interesting differences between NZ and US – there most residential structures have earthquake insurance. And their new construction requires consideration of seismic risk, but relatively few older masonry buildings were retrofitted for seismic safety. Sadly, the central business district of ChristChurch lost many of its historic masonry buildings.

1 thought on “Comparison of NZ and US seismic safety approaches

  1. there most residential structures have earthquake insurance.

    If you have house/building insurance then you have earthquake cover – cover from the government Earthquake Commission is included automatically.

Leave a reply to scrubone Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.