Religious organization often play a major role in helping disaster victims.  Interesting account of some lessons learned and advice given. See How Churches Can Prepare for Disasters.

And I would like to add that Jewish institutions, such as synagogues and day schools, also have a strong interest in this topic. A great deal of work is going on in NYC regarding the role of religious institutions as supporters of community life.

Two excellent articles from the NY Times today:

• Why No Safe Room to Run to? Cost and Plains Culture.
• A Survival Plan for American’s Tornado Danger Zone

And it appears that the Mayor of Moore thinks safe rooms should be required! See;  Mayor of tornado-ravaged town: New law needed to keep people safe; CNN, May 22.

The mayor of tornado-ravaged Moore, Oklahoma, will push for a law requiring storm shelters or safe rooms in new homes, he told CNN Wednesday.”We’ll try to get it passed as soon as I can,” Glenn Lewis said.The ordinance would apply to single-family and multi-family homes.

Too bad it did not happen sooner…..

Update at 7pm, May 22: I have seen TV interviews of both the Governor and Lt. Governor of OK today and both dodged the question about making shelters in public buildings a mandatory requirement. Judy Woodruth of NPR really pressed Governor Fallin quite hard on the topic, but the Governor essentially said the cost ( a few thousand dollars per building) was an issue.

In my quest to get more details about the recent poll on American disaster preparedness, I wrote to Mr. John Zogby the noted pollster who co-authored the article with SUNYIT.  (More details about that poll will be available in the future.)

He offered the following observations about the findings:

I have been polling since 1984 and have a perspective on these things. When I first started: Americans still littered and smoked, and they did not recycle. We have changed a lot. Here are some of things I have shared with clients and audiences along the way:

1. Fear is not the motivator we hope it will be. People just don’t want to live their lives looking over their shoulders. The message has to be more pro-active, protecting our children, providing a safer world and community
2. They will always trust the personal, familial, and local more than bigger agencies.
3. When Margaret Mead testified before the Senate about whether or not Americans would conserve on energy in the 1970s she noted that if the cause is right, the leadership is there, and everyone is assured that everyone else is participating, they will do it.
4. Today, most children come home from Kindergarten their first day of school with a message about saving the earth by not littering and about recycling. This is the long-haul strategy, too.

So, I guess we need the take the long view and keep trucking!!!

Well, win some lose some.  Just when I was feeling encouraged by previous post which features a report that talks about future threats/hazards/disasters, all of which require renewing and increasing efforts to deal with them, along comes a poll with some very discouraging news about the status of popular awareness and intelligence about threats and hazards and current preparedness efforts.

This news comes from a recent SUNYIT-Zogby Analytics Poll with the results reported on in Forbes. See: Americans Neither Worried Nor Prepared In Case of a Disaster.   As someone who has spent decades trying to enlighten our citizenry and public officials, this report is terrible news.  Here are some excerpts:

Only one in four Americans or less are concerned that an emergency situation like a terrorist attack, natural disaster, or health pandemic will affect their community, according to a new SUNYIT/Zogby Analytics Poll.

The poll of 1,000 adults nationwide was conducted online by Zogby Analytics on May 8-9 and has a margin of sampling error of +/-3.2 percentage points. A wide range of national security topics was covered.When asked of the likelihood if a series of emergency situations were to occur in their community, the following percentages said the emergency was “likely” or “very likely”: 26% a general emergency, 24% an industrial accident, 23% a natural disaster, 20% a mass shooting, 19% a terrorist attack, and 15% a health pandemic.

If such an emergency situation were to occur, the most likely locations cited were a shopping mall (46%), an airport or train station (43%), a stadium or arena (42%), on a bus/plane or train (38%), an outdoor sporting or community event (35%), a school (30%), a roadway (28% ) or office building (28%), a bridge (27%), a hospital (25%), or at home (22%).

While 55% of respondents said that they were “confident in (their) knowledge of proper safety procedures”, only 36% said that they presently “have an emergency plan in place” in case of a major emergency.In case of a neighborhood emergency, Americans expressed more confidence in their family’s preparedness (53%) over local government (44%), their airport (41%), local school (39%), or employer (31%). In case of a national emergency, Americans are most trusting in local law enforcement in case of a shooting (58%), the FBI in case of a terrorist attack (53%), the Centers for Disease Control in case of a pandemic (49%), and the Federal Emergency Relief Administration in case of a natural disaster (45%).

The results suggest to me that not only are people complacent or apathetic, they also are not making the correct assumptions about who and what organizations/institutions they could rely on. Has anyone been reading the research, books, or informed articles the emergency management community has produced????

The National Academy of Public Administration was asked to assess the National Weather Service; the result is this report:
Forecast for the Future; Assuring the Capacity of the National Weather Service.

The latest version of this periodic report is now outs.  See: The UNISDR 2013 Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction (GAR13): Creating Shared Value: the Business Case for Disaster Risk Reduction

• Full Text of Report

• Infographics

• Two news articles: Prevention Web and Relief Web  

This approval follows those mentioned earlier, for the State of the NY and NJ.  As of May 10, the NY city plan was reported as approved. More details are available on this website of the city government.

Some excerpts of the new article:

Secretary Shaun Donovan today announced HUD’s approval of New York City’s disaster recovery plan to help homeowners and businesses following Hurricane Sandy.  Funded through HUD’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, New York City’s action plan calls for a combined $1.77 billion investment in a variety of housing, infrastructure and business recovery activities.

The federal government has been on the ground since Sandy struck and will continue to provide substantial resources and technical assistance until the entire region is rebuilt safer, better and stronger. To date, FEMA has provided over $1.2 billion in individual and public assistance in New York City and the Small Business Administration has provided over $1.4 billion in disaster recovery loans to businesses throughout New York State.

Donovan, who also chairs President Obama’s Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Task Force, said today’s approval will allow the City to begin the long-term process of rebuilding damaged housing, restoring infrastructure, and stimulating business activity and job growth.“This plan is truly a neighborhood-based approach to disaster recovery,” said Donovan. “We’ve worked closely with Mayor Bloomberg, Senators Schumer and Gillibrand, and the New York Congressional Delegation throughout this process to help families get back in their homes, jumpstart local economies and make communities more resilient.”