Disasters and Poverty – new international report

Natural disasters ‘making poor poorer’ warn ODI is the heading for an article about a new report issued by the Overseas Development Institute. The data and the graphics in the report are quite sobering.  Some excerpts for the article:

The ODI has revealed 319 million poor people will be living in the countries most exposed to natural disasters by 2030

Natural disasters in some of the poorest parts of the world pose a terminal threat to success in the global battle against poverty, says a new report.

The Overseas Development Institute (ODI) research, costing around £60,000, estimates that around a third of a billion extremely poor people will be living in countries highly exposed to natural hazards such as drought and flooding by 2030.

… the lead author Tom Mitchell, the ODI’s head of climate change, warned that by 2030 around 325 million people will be living in countries acutely vulnerable to volatile changes in the weather.

“We know that disasters entrench poverty – they don’t just end lives, they destroy shops, roads, crops, houses and hospitals in places where there are no safety nets such as insurance or social security,” he said.

“Without meaningful change, talk of the end of extreme poverty is pie in the sky.”

The Full text of the report, which it titled Geography of Poverty, Disasters and Climate Extremes in 2030, is 88 pages and the executive summary is 6 pages.

This entry was posted in Climate Change, Human Impacts. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Disasters and Poverty – new international report

  1. Linda Noson says:

    Not only does disaster make the poor poorer, it creates new poor from those who were getting by, but just barely.

  2. Given the very real progress in disaster risk reduction in Bangladesh in particular I found this report to be a little tepid. However, the most intriguing aspect was the idea of a resilience “buffer” – a reserve that would enable people to weather the storm [pardon the bad pun!]. As the authors note, this is a new concept, but one that is intuitively correct. Also one that conflicts with the economic policies of most governments – the idea of a reserve means saving; current economic policies are predicated on consumption and growth.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s