Role of Science in Policymaking Has Been Diminished in Trump Administration

From the NY Times: In the Trump Administration, Science Is Unwelcome. So Is Advice.”As the president prepares for nuclear talks, he lacks a close adviser with nuclear expertise. It’s one example of a marginalization of science in shaping federal policy.”

An account of the missing science advisors and scientific advisory committees, starting with the missing White House Science Advisor. A frightening concern going into nuclear weapons talks.

New GAO Report

New GAO Report: Emergency Management: Implementation of the Major Disaster Declaration Process for Federally Recognized Tribes

According to tribal officials GAO surveyed and interviewed, there are several factors they considered when deciding whether to make a direct request or to join a state’s request for a major disaster declaration. Key factors that tribes reported considering were the (1) importance of tribal sovereignty, (2) financial matters such as the timeliness with which they receive funds, (3) the level of support they anticipated receiving from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and (4) their own emergency management capacity. For example, survey results showed that tribal officials’ confidence in their capacity to manage the declaration was a key factor in determining whether to make a request directly. Specifically, various elements of emergency management capacity, as illustrated below, could affect tribes’ ability to manage a declaration.

Is Structural Mitigation the Answer for Protecting Boston Harbor?

The Diva was watching Nightly Business News on May 30th and was especially interested in a feature they did about potential flooding in Boston harbor and its effects on current and planned real estate development in that area. [Personal note: the Diva is from the Boston area and her dad owned a store in the harbor area.]

I was told by a Boston-based friend that recently there has been extensive news coverage regarding a proposed flood barrier costing over $12 billion dollars, which will not be fully completed until 2050. That is a long time to wait, and one can only wonder if a barrier will in fact solve the Boston Harbor inundation problem due to sea level rise.

I was told that Boston’s 2015 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan did not include the proposed flood barrier,  but preferred natural shoreline solutions which are much less expensive to implement on a quicker timeline.

For those interested in the Boston mitigation situation, which is probably a bellweather for other major eastern coastal cities, here are several news articles:

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/massachusetts/articles/2018-05-30/report-harbor-barrier-could-take-30-years-and-12b-to-build

 http://www.wbur.org/news/2018/05/30/boston-harbor-barrier-flooding-umass-study
 
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2018/05/29/the-next-big-dig-umass-study-warns-boston-harbor-barrier-not-worth-cost-effort/BdEjVDgNNucNM8gP1tlZ4O/story.html
 
http://www.bostonherald.com/opinion/editorials/2018/05/editorial_costly_plans_wrong_way_to_solve_coastal_flooding
 
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/05/30/report-boston-harbor-barrier-could-take-30-years-cost-12b.html
 
http://www.newburyportnews.com/news/regional_news/report-boston-harbor-barrier-doesn-t-make-sense-to-prevent/article_20597391-5745-5a16-a5cc-875529c7f146.html
 
 

Book Review: Handbook of Disaster Research

Book Review: Handbook of Disaster Research (2nd Edition). Rodríguez, H., Trainor, J. & Donner, W. (Eds.) (2018). Handbook of Disaster Research (2nd Edition). Springer International Publishing AG. 619 pp. $349.99 (hardcover). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4 . Reviewed by Laura L. Olson, PhD.

Note: Since this is an unusually large and important book, and this review is 4 pages long, please click here to see the full review: Handbook of Disaster Research