Here are some useful examples of what “snap back” and resilient recovery plans look like. It remains to be seen how the conflicts and tradeoffs between the two will be addressed.
Winter looming, New York rushes to repair homes hit by superstorm Sandy: Hiring private contractors to repair homes quickly, New York responds to disaster relief in its own entrepreneurial way. Will the city be able to get people back in their homes before year’s end? [This article is based in part on the testimony that NY Congressman Nadler gave at a House Committee Hearing on Dec. 4th, part of which was the basis for my posting yesterday.]
This article covers the inherent conflicts in the recovery process: how to get rapid action on repairs and recovery for homeowners — in this case in the winter time, in a location where the usual types of temporary housing are not an option. What remains to be determined are ways to mitigate the likely future storm damage.
Long-Term Recovery Plans:
Bravo to Mayor Bloomberg for his understanding of and commitment to a recovery process that results in a more resilient NYC in the future. [Link to full text is here.] On Dec. 6th the Mayor spoke out about long-term recovery intentions:
- Mayor Announces Plans to Protect City From Natural Disasters. NYT Dec. 6.
- Sandy ; NY Leads Climate Change Battle; Yahoo., Dec. 6