Book Review: The Politics of Crisis Management

The Politics of Crisis Management” by Arjen Boin, Paul ‘t Hart, Eric Stern, and Bengt Sundelius. 2017 (2nd edition); Cambridge University Press.

Reviewed by Greg Jones.

This is the second edition of this book, produced by a multinational scholarly team.  The authors note openly in their introduction that a lot has occurred since the first (2006) edition was released.  They are unabashedly trying to keep up and they succeed admirably.

Their “model” (the scholarly go-to mechanism to explain and understand a complex environment) is straightforward, useful, and remarkably jargon – free.  Delineated into five “critical strategic leadership tasks”, the book’s model structure is well – suited for stimulating thoughtful reflection in segments.  Busy emergency management professionals can readily take these ideas aboard in the half – hour – per – evening time gaps that are all their duties may allow.

The authors describe the pressure with which governing leaders and councils must contend in a crisis.  Their efforts are the essence of “politics”.  (“Politics”, for our purposes here, is the building of consensus and resources to enact policy and achieve objectives.)  In the moments – to – weeks after the crisis event, management, leadership, confidence, communications and compassion are at a vital premium.  The display or absence of these qualities is the running public evaluation of emergency management competence.

Community trust hinges and fluctuates upon that evaluation.  The more catastrophic the event, the narrower the margin for the political leadership to earn and, at least temporarily, maintain that trust.  Boin and his team describe clearly how political councils can all too rapidly squander their margin for effective decision making and quickly find themselves beset by another crisis: the necessity to re-establish public confidence.  This in addition to trying to manage the original, actual event response.

The authors are performing an important service with their writing.  They are both expanding and elevating the thought space for the emergency and disaster management community.

The “expanding” occurs when they push outward from specific event types.  The subject being explored here is “all hazards” and “all origins”.  They assert that common features exist and drive how today’s societies react to any serious, large – scale emergency.

The “elevating” in their writing is not only about government jurisdictions.  They suggest that all events have political dimensions above the incident site and that those developments matter.  Long – term consequences (hopefully improvements) emerge from the post – event, intensely political conversations.

Whatever your emergency management discipline, and whether your political leader is a mayor, governor, or president, you’ll recognize the dynamics described in this book, and it’s insights will help you, help them manage bad events better.

___________________________________________________________________

Gregg Jones is CEO of the global crisis management consultancy Strategic Applications, LLC, and lectures on crisis and emergency management at Georgetown University. He is currently researching the impact of volunteers in humanitarian emergencies. More of his writing is at http://theagilestrategist.blogspot.com

FEMA Criticized for Slow Action

Ad noted in earlier postings, FEMA is working 22 declarations and in the process of hiring 2,000 workers. Therefore, it is not a surprise that response and recovery in the areas recently struck by major hurricanes are lagging. See: Still Waiting for FEMA in Texas and Florida After Hurricanes

Outside the White House this month, President Trump boasted about the federal relief efforts. “In Texas and in Florida, we get an A-plus,” he said. FEMA officials say that they are successfully dealing with enormous challenges posed by an onslaught of closely spaced disasters, unlike anything the agency has seen in years. But on the ground, flooded residents and local officials have a far more critical view.

According to interviews with dozens of storm victims, one of the busiest hurricane seasons in years has overwhelmed federal disaster officials. As a result, the government’s response in the two biggest affected states — Texas and Florida — has been scattershot: effective in dealing with immediate needs, but unreliable and at times inadequate in handling the aftermath, as thousands of people face unusually long delays in getting basic disaster assistance.

Questionable FEMA Contracts

From Bloomberg News: FEMA Is Spending Billions, and Some Questionable Companies Are Getting Work. A surge in disaster contracts from hurricanes has put the agency under pressure to bypass the usual competitive bidding process.

Two excerpts:

This year’s record hurricane season has led to the biggest spike in government disaster contracts in more than a decade, testing the government’s ability to manage the unpredictable and growing costs of climate change. Since Hurricane Harvey struck Texas on Aug. 25, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has awarded $2.2 billion in contracts….

BOTTOM LINE – Since Hurricane Harvey hit, FEMA has given out $2.2 billion in contracts, some of which are being awarded to companies with past violations for similar work.
Update:  On the one hand I am sympathetic to FEMA: the agency is working 22 disasters; they are trying to hire 2,000 new employees, and they are contracting out for billions of dollars of goods and services. I know the staff is working hard.
But as a taxpayer, I am concerned about contracts for essential drinking water from a contractor who has not meet deadlines and commitments for a previous disaster response.

 

Trump Threatens to Abandon PR Recovery Efforts

From the WashPost this morning: Trump threatens to abandon Puerto Rico recovery efforts. President Trump served notice that he may pull back federal workers from Puerto Rico, effectively threatening to abandon the U.S. territory amid a humanitarian crisis in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria.

This is a truly alarming development; and I wonder if it is even legal to do so?

Update: comment from the Mayor of San Juan in response to the President’s tweet:  wa ‘You are incapable of empathy and frankly cannot get the job done.’