Rebuilding After Sandy – new issue of EM Magazine

The Diva has an article about the Sandy Rebuilding Task Force Report in the latest issue of Emergency Management Magazine. The digital version of the Nov. 2013 issue, is devoted to the topic of rebuilding after a disaster. My article, titled Sandy Task Force Issues Recommendations for Long-Term Recovery, is on pages 23-26.  The hard copy version will probably be out in another week or so.

As also, I welcome feedback.

Social Impact of Disasters

A Year After Sandy, Research Focuses on the Social Impact of Disasters
Researchers say projects combine different disciplines and seek to improve communication

In this article there is a list of the projects recently funded by the National Science Foundation. The emphasis seems to be on social impacts, communication mechanisms/techniques, and some warning studies. My personal wish is that there were some project addressing public administration and public policy aspects — where are the social scientists in these fields and why are they not applying for grant funds from NSF?

Anniversary of Superstorm Sandy

A few days ago I did a posting that listed some of the things that did not go well regarding Superstorm Sandy. Here are some more positive aspects on a wide array of topics:

A Few More Negatives re Sandy Recovery

From the NJ Today online paper, see Superstorm Sandy Recovery Report Cards Call for More Action.  No good marks for anyone!  (Thanks to Chris Jones for pointing out this site.)

From CNN today: What we Did Not Learn from Sandy.

And Dont’t Rebuild in Vulnerable Areas. Before Sandy hit many knew which areas and what infrastructure was vulnerable.

Frauds and Scams After Sandy. Oct. 29.

In NJ, Sandy Victims Unhappy with Their Governor

As is often the case, politicians overpromise and underdeliver.  And it is a good idea not to have your disaster in the year prior to a gubenatorial election!

Year After Hurricane Sandy, Victims Contest Christie’s Status as a Savior.  The first few paragraphs are:

Hurricane Sandy turned Chris Christie into something akin to America’s governor, as the nation watched him express his state’s pain on the devastated shoreline the morning after the storm, then triumphantly cut the ribbons on reopened boardwalks on Memorial Day. “We’re stronger than the storm,” he proclaimed in television commercials that ran in other states all summer.

But in the affected parts of New Jersey, Governor Christie’s storm campaign has not sold as well. With at least 26,000 people still out of their homes a year later, he has become the focus of ire for many storm survivors who say that the recovery does not look as impressive to them as it does to the rest of the country.

Homeowners promised money from Mr. Christie’s rebuilding program say they have yet to see it; those who have been denied aid vent about the bureaucracy. Some criticize him for encouraging residents to build to new flood zone standards to speed recovery; homeowners now say they are being penalized, because anyone who started rebuilding is ineligible for a grant.

On October 28, Christie fired back at critics and deflected the blame.

Another H. Sandy Is Possible Say Geologists

One more set of concerns, this time from geologists. Geologists: Sandy could happen again. Some excerpts:

Sandy’s storm surge hit the coast at high tide, but storm and tidal conditions were not the only cause of the devastation. Seawaters off New York’s coast have risen sixteen inches since 1778, the year of New York City’s first major recorded storm. Geologists say that due to rising sea levels, smaller storms could produce significant flooding.

Almost a year after Hurricane Sandy, parts of New York and New Jersey are still recovering from billions of dollars in flood damage. Tufts University geologist Andrew Kemp sees the possibility of damage from storms smaller than Sandy in the future.

“Rising sea levels exacerbate flooding,” says Kemp. “As sea level rises, smaller and weaker storms will cause flood damage.”
An assistant professor in Tufts’ Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Kemp co-authored a study on sea-level change close
to New York that was published recently in the Journal of Quaternary Science.

http://now.tufts.edu/news-releases/could-sandy-happen-again

FEMA Testimony on Recovery

Written testimony of FEMA Office of Response and Recovery Associate Administrator Joseph Nimmich for a House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management hearing titled “FEMA Reauthorization: Recovering Quicker and Smarter” (9/18/2013)

The part I found most interesting were the comments in the section headed “Lessons Learned from Hurricane Sandy and FEMA’s After Action Report. Once again, I think these points are teaching points identified rather than lessons learned — it remains to be seen if they have been learned!  Many of these points have been made before, in after-actions reports from H. Katrina, H. Andrew and many others..

Some excerpts:

The Hurricane Sandy After-Action Report identifies the Agency’s strengths and more importantly provides recommendations to improve FEMA’s response and recovery efforts. The report identifies four central themes for improvement:

* Ensuring unity of effort across the federal response. The severity of the storm underscored several areas for improvement related to FEMA’s ability to coordinate federal operations, including integrating senior leader communications into response and recovery operations; coordinating resources through the Emergency and Recovery Support Functions (ESF and RSF respectively); operational decision-making.

    Next steps include developing appropriate training, exercises, and outreach programs to foster greater coordination and communication among ESFs and RSFs, making the mission assignment process as efficient and transparent as possible, and improving efficiencies in the way FEMA provides support to large-scale events. Additional recommendations address implementation of the Agency’s Lessons Learned/Continuous Improvement Program (LL/CIP).

    In support of this effort, FEMA/National Exercise Division recently supported the National Security Staff in their conduct of a Principals’ Level Exercise (PLE) for Cabinet members to review their roles, responsibilities, and authorities within the National Response Framework (NRF), the National Disaster Recovery Framework (NDRF), and the National Continuity Policy (NCP). Conducted prior to the start of the 2013 hurricane season, the exercise examined issues identified during previous incidents including interagency coordination during the 2012 hurricane season and, in particular, Hurricane Sandy. ***

* Being survivor-centric: Leadership at FEMA adopted a “cut the red tape” posture to better serve survivors and communities, but opportunities remain, including meeting survivors’ needs during initial interactions with FEMA; ensuring all survivors have equal access to services; and reducing the complexity of the public assistance program.

 * Fostering unity of effort across the whole community: Sandy highlighted the need for FEMA to improve coordination with tribal governments and clarify how the agency interacts with local governments in disasters affecting large urban areas.

    Recommendations include anticipating cities’ resource requirements and understanding their capabilities, coordinating directly with local jurisdictions when it supports a forward-leaning response, promoting better integration between states and large urban governments, including encouraging local and tribal participation in the Unified Coordination Group where appropriate, and preparing response teams to handle incidents where state, local and tribal jurisdictions require clarification of the roles and responsibilities or have differing priorities during an incident.

* Developing an agile, professional, emergency management workforce: In response to Sandy, FEMA completed one of the largest personnel deployments in its history. FEMA is committed to supporting disaster survivors and their communities through the most effective and efficient means possible. In support of this commitment, FEMA has sought to expand, improve and diversify its disaster workforce. One example of a successful improvement is the DHS Surge Capacity Force (SCF), which is comprised of volunteer employees from various DHS components that are activated during catastrophic or large scale events when required. Currently the SCF has 3,901 volunteers, all of whom receive basic FEMA disaster assistance training prior to deployment. Sandy marked the historic inaugural activation of the SCF, with more than 1,100 SCF volunteers deploying in support of response and recovery efforts. The contributions of the SCF volunteers and other FEMA personnel in the areas of Community Relations and IA resulted in more than 182,000 survivors receiving more than $1.42 billion in assistance as of September 5, 2013.

    Further, beginning in April 2013, FEMA undertook a one-year pilot project to restructure its Incident Management Assistance Teams (IMATs) to provide increased capability by representing more FEMA programs and interagency representatives and by leveraging the hiring flexibilities provided by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. These three pilot teams will have 32 full-time, excepted service FEMA employees. These teams completed a rigorous 12 week training program and are prepared to deploy now. These teams will represent 13 different FEMA offices with the potential for including up to nine representatives from ESFs and interagency partners. ESF partners have begun assigning personnel to these teams. ***

    FEMA is continuing implementation of the FEMA Qualification System, improving plans and processes to support the logistical and administrative needs of a large deployed workforce, and improving continuity of operations and devolution plans to account for large-scale deployments.

FEMA has established a senior-level Continuous Improvement Working Group to track implementation of the recommendations and next steps included in the report. Thirty percent of the report’s recommendations have been implemented already, with 90 percent expected to be completed by year’s end.

Superstorm Sandy Research Lab

NYU

As noted in the bulletin of the Hazards Center at the Univ. of CO/Boulder:

“The Superstorm Research Lab is a collective of scholars working to cross boundaries between traditional academic publishing and information sharing for the common good—all within the scope of social and environmental issues surrounding Hurricane Sandy. The group’s open online resource site hosts a wealth of information including qualitative interviews, data sets, maps, and documents from a variety of sources. Whether you’re in the market to find or share, this site is a treasure trove of Sandy info.”

The Diva liked the Public Reports page especially.  The Lab is supported by NY University.

 

Some Recovery Planning Guidance – from NY State

This 81 page document is titled Guidance for Community Reconstruction Zone Plans. It provides a lot of detailed planning guidance.

The source is an organization called NY Rising, which is a State-sponsored organization. More details are available at this website.

NOTE: See comment by Dr. Tom Phelan re potential importance of this new approach to recovery.

FEMA’s After Action Report on Superstorm Sandy

I am not quite sure when this was issued, but the direct link to the 38 page report is here: Hurricane Sandy FEMA After Action Report; July 2013.

For those of you interested in FEMA workforce issues, the report devotes quite a bit of discussion to that topic.

In the next two weeks or so, I expect to see the Sandy Task Force Recovery Strategy report. When I get it, I will post it here.