Houston Passes New Rules to Reduce Flood Damage

Houston Passes First Post-Harvey Rules to Reduce Flood Damage

Starting this fall, all new homes built in Houston’s floodplains must be elevated higher off the ground after a contentious debate and narrow vote by City Council on Wednesday to adopt the Bayou City’s first major regulatory response to the widespread flooding Hurricane Harvey unleashed last August.

The vote marks a shift away from Houston’s longtime aversion to constraining development, and means all new construction in the city’s floodplains will have to be built two feet above the projected water level in a 500-year storm.

Scott Pruitt: 22 reasons he should be fired

As readers know, the Diva feels strongly that the integrity and mission of the EPA is essential for this country to deal with environmental issues and disasters.  The Administrator of EPA is under intense pressure for ethical and other issues.

From the HuffPost, this list of violations: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/scott-pruitt-scandals-list_us_5ac66dffe4b09d0a1191647f

Update: From Politico  this account of the damage a corrupt and unethical agency head can do: Inside the EPA: ‘It’s just a slow-motion train wreck’ ‘Everybody is out for themselves right now,’ says one employee in an agency where people are fretting about leaks and Scott Pruitt’s scandals.

 

Delay in Chemical Rule

New Report: One Year In, EPA Chemical Rule Delay Allows Chemical Disasters to Continue.

While news this week suggests that EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt is a walking ethics disaster, he’s long been paving the way for actual disasters—chemical disasters that is. A report released today, A Disaster in the Making, by community, environmental, health, workers, and scientist groups, illuminates how Pruitt’s unnecessary delay of the Chemical Disaster Rule continues to harm Americans.

Reminder re Smoke Alarms

One of the readers of this blog is a staffer at the Red Cross. She asked that I share this information about home preparedness.

Every day, seven people die in home fires, most in homes that lack working smoke alarms. But new research from the American Red Cross shows that Americans underestimate the chance that a home fire could happen to them and are unaware of simple steps that can help keep them safe.

  • In fact…Only 1 in 4 people believe they are likely to experience a home fire in their lifetime
  • About 40% of people have forgotten to turn off a stove or oven, even though cooking is the leading cause of home fires.
  • 80% of people believe everyone in their household knows what to do when a smoke alarm goes off. But the fact is that less than half have a plan in place, and only about half have practiced that plan.
  • 1 out of 10 have had to sacrifice buying other essentials for their families to purchase a smoke alarm.

The Red Cross is combating these statistics and misinformation by installing smoke alarms and discussing fire safety nationwide. To continue to save lives, the Red Cross will Sound the Alarm about fire safety through a series of smoke alarm installation events in more than 100 high-risk communities in the United States. In just 16 days – from April 28 to May 13 – volunteers and partners will install 100,000 free smoke alarms. So far, the Red Cross and partners have installed 1.1 million smoke alarms that have saved 381 lives.

For more information, visit the site www.soundthealarm.org to find opportunities in their area.

See also stories from Families Saved by Smoke Alarms: https://vimeo.com/262437348/722af2a8f9

Coastal Peril – flood risk

From HSNewswire: Flood risk denial in U.S. coastal communities

Rising sea levels have worsened the destruction that routine tidal flooding causes in the nation’s coastal communities. On the U.S. mainland, communities in Louisiana, Florida and Maryland are most at risk. Stemming the loss of life and property is a complex problem. Elected officials can enact policies to try to lessen the damage of future flooding. Engineers can retrofit vulnerable buildings. But, in the face of a rising tide, changing hearts and minds might be the most formidable obstacle to decreasing the damage done by flooding.

Journal Article of Interest

Journal article from Science Direct: Communicating contested geoscience to the public: Moving from ‘matters of fact’ to ‘matters of concern.”

Geological issues are increasingly intruding on the everyday lives of ordinary people. Whether it is the onshore extraction of oil and gas, the subsurface injection of waters for geothermal power or the deep storage of waste products, communities across the world are being confronted with controversial geological interventions beneath their backyards. Communicating these complex scientific and technical issues is made more challenging by the general public’s unfamiliarity with the geological realm

Thanks to Chris Jones for the citation.

Pruitt’s EPA = No Studies, No Data, No Rules

From the Ny Times: At Pruitt’s E.P.A.: No Studies, No Data, No Rules

The Diva used for work for EPA in the division that dealt with emergencies related to hazardous materials.  That is important work, and should not be conducted without benefit of science.

Update on April 7th: From the NYTimes, an interesting article on the likely rescinding of much of the damage done by EPA due to lack of science and hard data. See: In His Haste to Roll Back Rules, Scott Pruitt, E.P.A. Chief, Risks His Agenda