Author Archives: recoverydiva
“Rebuilding for resilience; fortifying infrastructure to withstand disaster”
This excellent report provides some useful guidance and weaves in case examples nicely. The report was written the by firm PWC, but the download location is Prevention web. Note that you have a choice of components to download when you request the report. From the introduction::
This report extends the focus of the UNISDR-PwC initiative, looking specifically at the long-term opportunity for public-private sector collaboration in building or rebuilding risk-resilient infrastructure. It describes why building disaster-resilient infrastructure is critical for a region’s competitiveness, both nationally and globally. It also illustrates how the private sector can offer innovative solutions to help communities build or rebuild disaster-resilient infrastructure.
The report explores in depth six key recommendations: (i) focus on preparedness, prevention, and mitigation now; (ii) foster collaboration across public and private sectors; (iii) motivate community-wide engagement; (iv) coordinate across regional boundaries; (v) encourage resilient recovery with optimal incentives; and (vi) build back stronger and smarter. The findings in this report are relevant for cities, regions, and businesses the world over as they prepare to face the growing risks of natural disaster, compounded by the mounting challenges of the 21st century—as well as for those currently rebuilding.
Practical note: be sure to print off in best quality setting to ensure readability.
Thanks to Ed Metz for calling this report to my attention.
More Details About the CO Floods – updated
CONTAMINATED DRINKING WATER – Lyons
TOTAL COST ESTIMATED AT MORE THAN $2B
POSITIVE COST-BENEFIT FROM MITIGATION EFFORTS– from Bill Hooke’s blog
CLIMATE CHANGE NOT THOUGHT TO BE A FACTOR; Sept. 25
BOULDER STORM SUMMIT – conference summary, Sept. 26
PROBLEMS WITH BROKEN ROADS, Sept. 28
Learn from Experience? — not necessarily for some in Congress
A new report from the Center for American Progress is titled States With most federal disaster aid sent climate science deniers to congress.
Since this report is only 8 pages long, I suggest you read it all. One excerpt:
Interestingly, many of the states that received the most federal recovery aid to cope with climate-linked extreme weather have federal legislators who are climate-science deniers. The 10 states that received the most federal recovery aid in FY 2011 and 2012 elected 47 climate-science deniers to the Senate and the House. nearly two-thirds of the senators from these top 10 recipient stated voted against grants federal emergency aid to NJ and NY after Superstorm Sandy.
Boulder, CO – Lessons Were Learned!
Many years of study and preparedness efforts on the part of both researchers and practitioners were behind the relatively positive outcome from recent flooding in Boulder, CO. It is not often that we can point to teaching points made and lessons actually learned, but here it one example.
With previous tragedy in mind, Boulder, Colo., was ready for flood; Flood damage is heavy in Boulder, Colo., but not what it could have been. Credit goes to changes made since a previous disaster. Some excerpts from this article follow:
Like communities up and down the Front Range, Boulder has long been known to be at high risk for flooding because it sits at the mouth of a canyon and is threaded with creeks. And officials here prepared for the inevitable. The city bought and removed buildings from flood-prone areas, built automatic floodgates around its creek-side municipal building and raised bridges to accommodate surging water and tumbling debris.
When epic rains soaked this city with more than 15 inches in just a few days, the planning seemed to pay off. While there was significant property damage, the city fared better than some neighboring communities ravaged by floodwaters. Not a single bridge in Boulder was destroyed.
The flood marker was put in place two years ago to show the expected water level in a 50-year flood, a 100-year flood and one comparable to the worst in local memory: the Big Thompson flash flood of 1976 that killed 144 people in a canyon to the north. It is also a memorial to Gilbert White, the late University of Colorado professor known as the “father of flood plain management,” who believed that people should move structures out of flood-prone areas instead of relying on dams and levees.
But for many other communities affected by the flood, the news was not good. See this NY Times article titled After flood colorado communities face difficult recovery. As is typically true in the aftermath of a disaster, the poor get hurt the worst because they usually live in the most vulnerable locations and in poorly constructed homes. (NYT Sept. 22.)
Sept. 23- recap of the events and key data from the Boulder Camera article. (19 pp.)
Infographic on Business Continuity After a Disaster
The folks at the CDC Foundation has prepared a really excellent interactive graphic. See this Business Continuity infographic.
Since the Diva wanted to print it off and use it as a poster, the staff at the foundation were gracious enough to break it up into 3 pdf files so that it would print off. If you want a copy of the 3 files to print, contact the Diva directly.
Related articles
- Business Continuity Planning Is Worth the Effort (thehartford.com)
- Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (commitmentmatters.com)
World’s Most Vulnerable Cities – from Swiss Re
From a article in USAToday, using data from the insurance co. Swiss Re; fortunately, only one of these is in the U.S. No others are in North America.
World’s most vulnerable cities, with population:
- Tokyo-Yokohama, Japan (57.1 million)
- Manila, Philippines (34.6 million)
- Pearl-River Delta, China (34.5 million)
- Osaka-Kobe, Japan (32.1 million)
- Jakarta, Indonesia (27.7 million)
- Nagoya, Japan (22.9 million)
- Kolkata, India (17.9 million)
- Shanghai, China (16.7 million)
- Los Angeles (16.4 million)
- Tehran, Iran (15.6 million)
There also is a 36 page report that provides more details, available at this site. There are smaller reports for various continents available also.
Content on CO Floods – updated on Sept. 19
Considering how many research institutions, academics, and social media devotees there are in the areas impacted by the flooding in CO, I am expecting a great deal of information of interest re the flooding risk, vulnerability, and history is available on the Internet. So far, it has been trickling in. Here are some specifics:
Comments and suggestions are beginning to come in – see the comment section below.
- BASIN: http://bcn.boulder.co.us/basin/
- BASIN: Flood History
- Some early damage estimates
- Some USGS sources: http://water.usgs.gov/floods/events/2013/SepCO/ and
http://co.water.usgs.gov/ - Amazing pictures of the flood damage
- Flood history info from UCAR/Univ. of CO
- The foresight and vision of Gilbert White
- Thoughtful comments from the blog of meteorologist Bill Hooke
FEMA Testimony on Recovery
The part I found most interesting were the comments in the section headed “Lessons Learned from Hurricane Sandy and FEMA’s After Action Report. Once again, I think these points are teaching points identified rather than lessons learned — it remains to be seen if they have been learned! Many of these points have been made before, in after-actions reports from H. Katrina, H. Andrew and many others..
Some excerpts:
The Hurricane Sandy After-Action Report identifies the Agency’s strengths and more importantly provides recommendations to improve FEMA’s response and recovery efforts. The report identifies four central themes for improvement:
* Ensuring unity of effort across the federal response. The severity of the storm underscored several areas for improvement related to FEMA’s ability to coordinate federal operations, including integrating senior leader communications into response and recovery operations; coordinating resources through the Emergency and Recovery Support Functions (ESF and RSF respectively); operational decision-making.
Next steps include developing appropriate training, exercises, and outreach programs to foster greater coordination and communication among ESFs and RSFs, making the mission assignment process as efficient and transparent as possible, and improving efficiencies in the way FEMA provides support to large-scale events. Additional recommendations address implementation of the Agency’s Lessons Learned/Continuous Improvement Program (LL/CIP).
In support of this effort, FEMA/National Exercise Division recently supported the National Security Staff in their conduct of a Principals’ Level Exercise (PLE) for Cabinet members to review their roles, responsibilities, and authorities within the National Response Framework (NRF), the National Disaster Recovery Framework (NDRF), and the National Continuity Policy (NCP). Conducted prior to the start of the 2013 hurricane season, the exercise examined issues identified during previous incidents including interagency coordination during the 2012 hurricane season and, in particular, Hurricane Sandy. ***
* Being survivor-centric: Leadership at FEMA adopted a “cut the red tape” posture to better serve survivors and communities, but opportunities remain, including meeting survivors’ needs during initial interactions with FEMA; ensuring all survivors have equal access to services; and reducing the complexity of the public assistance program.
* Fostering unity of effort across the whole community: Sandy highlighted the need for FEMA to improve coordination with tribal governments and clarify how the agency interacts with local governments in disasters affecting large urban areas.
Recommendations include anticipating cities’ resource requirements and understanding their capabilities, coordinating directly with local jurisdictions when it supports a forward-leaning response, promoting better integration between states and large urban governments, including encouraging local and tribal participation in the Unified Coordination Group where appropriate, and preparing response teams to handle incidents where state, local and tribal jurisdictions require clarification of the roles and responsibilities or have differing priorities during an incident.
* Developing an agile, professional, emergency management workforce: In response to Sandy, FEMA completed one of the largest personnel deployments in its history. FEMA is committed to supporting disaster survivors and their communities through the most effective and efficient means possible. In support of this commitment, FEMA has sought to expand, improve and diversify its disaster workforce. One example of a successful improvement is the DHS Surge Capacity Force (SCF), which is comprised of volunteer employees from various DHS components that are activated during catastrophic or large scale events when required. Currently the SCF has 3,901 volunteers, all of whom receive basic FEMA disaster assistance training prior to deployment. Sandy marked the historic inaugural activation of the SCF, with more than 1,100 SCF volunteers deploying in support of response and recovery efforts. The contributions of the SCF volunteers and other FEMA personnel in the areas of Community Relations and IA resulted in more than 182,000 survivors receiving more than $1.42 billion in assistance as of September 5, 2013.
Further, beginning in April 2013, FEMA undertook a one-year pilot project to restructure its Incident Management Assistance Teams (IMATs) to provide increased capability by representing more FEMA programs and interagency representatives and by leveraging the hiring flexibilities provided by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. These three pilot teams will have 32 full-time, excepted service FEMA employees. These teams completed a rigorous 12 week training program and are prepared to deploy now. These teams will represent 13 different FEMA offices with the potential for including up to nine representatives from ESFs and interagency partners. ESF partners have begun assigning personnel to these teams. ***
FEMA is continuing implementation of the FEMA Qualification System, improving plans and processes to support the logistical and administrative needs of a large deployed workforce, and improving continuity of operations and devolution plans to account for large-scale deployments.
FEMA has established a senior-level Continuous Improvement Working Group to track implementation of the recommendations and next steps included in the report. Thirty percent of the report’s recommendations have been implemented already, with 90 percent expected to be completed by year’s end.
Canadians Lack Access to Flood Insurance
After watching some of the videos and reading accounts of the most recent major flooding in Colorado, it seems to me that having flood insurance would be a good idea.
But according to this article, the insurance is not available in Canada. See Flood Insurance is not Available to Canadian Homeowners; Should it Be?